NEWS & PUBLICATIONS

LinkedIn group “ICAO ePassports and eID Cards”: Nine thousand professionals. One conversation. No sales pitches.

You cannot digitise an identity system that doesn’t know who was born, who died, and who married whom. Civil registration and identity document issuance are treated as separate systems in most countries. Different ministries. Different budgets. Different databases. Different political priorities.

Ask anyone in your passport authority to draw the system architecture on a whiteboard. Time how long it takes before they reach for a laptop: A system that only its builders understand is a system its operators cannot sustain.

Your product roadmap has a three-year horizon. The standard it depends on has a seven-year development cycle. Do the maths: Standards aren’t just rules. They are market intelligence.

Twenty experts. On four continents. Zero juniors. The traditional consultancy model sends a partner to win the engagement and a team of associates to deliver it. The client buys authority and receives availability. The person who scopes the mandate is the person who delivers it

In a fragile state, the identity system isn’t broken. It was never built. Design for the context you find. Not the context you wish existed.

In a fragile state, the identity system isn’t broken. It was never built. International best practice assumes a functioning civil registration system, a reliable chain of custody for foundational documents, trained personnel, stable institutions, and continuous power supply. In fragile and post-conflict environments, none of these assumptions hold. Design for the context you find. Not the context you wish existed.

Automation without institutional readiness is not modernisation. It is automation of an existing vulnerability

Design your biometric strategy from the field backward. not from the datasheet forward.

“ICAO compliant” may be the most overused — and least understood — claim in the industry.

The answer is not to choose between security and humanity. It is to build systems that serve both.

The most valuable document in any advisory engagement is the one written before the work begins.

A biometric system that cannot interoperate is not a security system. It is an expensive database.

Who wrote your last national ID specification — and whose interests did it protect?

A good recommendation that surprises the wrong person is a failed recommendation.

The wallet will only be as trusted as the standards behind it.

Before a single interview is conducted or a single document reviewed, the most important decision in any identity programme advisory engagement has already been made — or hasn’t. That decision is scope. How many institutions will be assessed? How many site visits conducted? What grade of detail is expected in the analysis? What volume of documents will be reviewed? These are not administrative details. They are the boundaries that determine whether the project delivers insigh

If your system documentation can't be read in an afternoon, it won't be read at all.

The birth certificate is the most dangerous document in your identity system.

The first electronic identity card our founding partner helped deliver used a chip that held 32 kilobytes of data. Today’s secure documents carry biometric templates, digital signatures, and cryptographic keys that would have been unimaginable a generation ago. The technology has transformed beyond recognition: In thirty years, the technology has changed completely. The reasons programmes fail have not changed at all.